What ex-South Korean leader Yoon faces following his new arrest over martial law

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) – Four months after his release, South Korea’s disgraced former President Yoon Suk Yeol was sent back to a detention center after a Seoul court issued a warrant for his arrest Thursday.

Yoon’s brief, ill-fated imposition of martial law on Dec. 3 led to his indictment on charges that he directed a rebellion, which is punishable by life imprisonment or death. Prompted by concerns he might destroy evidence, Yoon’s arrest could mark the start of a prolonged period in custody as investigators pursue additional charges.

Yoon defended his martial law decree as a necessary step to quash “anti-state” liberal opponents, accusing them of abusing their legislative majority to obstruct his agenda. But the order lasted only hours, until a quorum of lawmakers broke through a blockade of heavily armed soldiers at the National Assembly and voted to overturn the order.

Here is what Yoon faces in one of the most explosive criminal cases in South Korea’s history.

Yoon’s self-inflicted downfall extended a decadeslong run of South Korean presidencies ending badly. But the outspoken conservative, who was removed from office in April, is the first South Korean president to be arrested, released and then arrested again within months.

Yoon became the country’s first sitting president to be detained following a Jan. 15 raid on his official residence in Seoul by hundreds of anti-corruption investigators and police, which came 12 days after presidential security forces blocked an attempt to take him into custody.

Seoul Western District Court later granted a formal arrest warrant, citing concerns by investigators that he could destroy evidence. The decision triggered a riot by his supporters.

Anti-corruption investigators then transferred the case to public prosecutors, who indicted him Jan. 26 on rebellion charges in the Seoul Central District Court, describing Yoon’s hourslong power grab as an illegal attempt to seize the legislature and election offices and arrest political opponents.

Following a challenge from Yoon’s defense team, the court ordered his release on March 7, citing unresolved questions about whether anti-corruption investigators had proper authority to detain him.

This allowed Yoon to stand trial for rebellion without being held in custody and take part in his impeachment trial at the Constitutional Court, which formally removed him from office in April.

There were moments when Yoon appeared to use his freedom to display defiance, such as when he showed up at a theater in May to watch a documentary film justifying his martial law decree, weeks ahead of the snap election to choose his successor.

Another attempt to arrest Yoon became predictable after the country’s new president, Lee Jae Myung, a liberal who won the June 3 vote, quickly approved legislation to launch special investigations into Yoon’s martial law debacle and other criminal allegations involving his wife and administration.

Yoon’s criminal case is being handled by a team of investigators led by special prosecutor Cho Eun-suk, whose team questioned Yoon twice before submitting a request for his arrest warrant over the weekend.

In their arrest warrant request, Cho’s team cited additional charges they are pushing against Yoon including obstructing official duties, abuse of power and falsifying and destroying documents.

Those charges stem from accusations that he sidestepped legally mandated actions before attempting to enact martial law, such as deliberation by a properly convened Cabinet meeting, and fabricated documents including a martial law proclamation in a belated attempt to satisfy formal requirements.

Yoon also is suspected of ordering presidential security officials to delete server records tied to “secret phones,” which refer to devices equipped with anti-wiretapping software he allegedly used to communicate with military commanders involved in carrying out the martial law order.

He also faces accusations of unlawfully deploying presidential security forces like a private army to block an initial attempt by law enforcement to detain him at his residence in early January.

Yoon’s lawyers have denied all the accusations and accused the special prosecutor of conducting a rushed, unsubstantiated investigation driven by political motives.

No longer afforded the security privileges of a sitting president, Yoon will give up his personal belongings, receive a serial number, change into light-green prison clothes and be confined to a small solitary cell reportedly equipped with a television, toilet, sink, table and mattress.

He may have to get used to it. His new arrest could mark the beginning of an extended period in custody, potentially lasting months or longer. Yoon can initially be held at the detention center for up to 20 days while the special prosecutor aims to indict him on additional charges.

If Yoon is indicted on new charges, he could be held for up to six months until an initial court ruling. If the court convicts him and hands down a prison term, Yoon would serve his sentence even as the case potentially moves to higher courts.

While Yoon’s lawyers could ask the court to review the legality of his arrest or seek his release on bail, it’s unclear whether such efforts would succeed as the court already has deemed him a threat to destroy evidence, experts say.